
I once worked at a major food bank during a transition that saw the nonprofit gently pivoting away from direct volunteer service towards more advocacy and community organizing. With this change, the food bank faced intense accusations of mission creep from volunteers, donors, and even staff who believed that food banks should focus on distributing food instead of advocacy. Even though our mission statement clearly expressed the intent to fight hunger rather than just distribute food, the change in tactics triggered significant opposition.
Every anti-hunger nonprofit I’ve ever worked for has at some point been accused of “mission creep.”
This is the idea that the organization’s focus or goals are expanding beyond its stated intentions or responsibilities. In my experience, any time a food justice organization reorganizes or evolves their strategy, they will face accusations of mission creep.

The greatest barrier we face to eliminating hunger is our collective assumptions and biases against people experiencing hunger. While the field had evolved significantly in recent decades, there is still significant resistance to prioritizing the dignity, respect, and autonomy of people experiencing hunger (over the distribution of food with the attitude of “be grateful for what you can get”). Mission creep is often weaponized to combat this shift in focus.
While there are organizations who may genuinely stray from their agendas, too often mission creep relates more to opposition of new strategies for fighting hunger.

The fear of being accused of losing focus can be an effective deterrent to innovation. It’s also a key concept that keeps nonprofits stuck addressing symptoms and not root causes. Food pantry leadership, fearful of such accusations, might continue to prioritize distributing food even when data shows convincing opportunities to reduce hunger through other avenues.
How food pantries can handle accusations of mission creep:

- Consult your mission. You’re not restricted to just handing out food if your mission is to fight or end hunger, if you already have a strong understanding of root causes. It’s up to your Board of Directors to determine how big your scope is, but adding programs like anti-poverty advocacy, education on food justice and sovereignty, and supporting immigrants can all fall under the umbrella of fighting hunger. If your mission statement doesn’t give you enough guidance, you need a new mission statement.
- Prepare to lose donors or volunteers, and gain others. I’ve met a number of food pantry volunteers who have been volunteering for decades, and feel very strongly that there’s nothing more important than direct service. While that’s an awesome attitude in a volunteer, it can also translate into strong opposition to change. Don’t adjust your long-term goals to accommodate one or two volunteers.
- Practice regular and consistent education on the root causes of hunger. The stronger an understanding your community has on what does and doesn’t cause hunger, the more capable they’ll be of understanding why you might adopt a more holistic approach to fighting poverty.
Previous Post: Food Pantries: Helping Shoppers Get Food Home
The opinions expressed here are solely my own and do not express the views or opinions of my employer.
Want to learn more about food justice? Subscribe so you never miss a post!




























































































